Jean Pascal and Michal Cieslak in the Fight to Stay Relevant

Jean Pascal stands alone in the ring’s centre, drenched in the cold glow of overhead lights that carve sharp-edged shadows along his scarred face. Once, that face belonged to a champion—WBC and lineal light-heavyweight champion, crowned from 2009 to 2011—but now it bears the quiet gravitas of survival.

Born in Port-au-Prince and exiled to Laval, Quebec, as a child, Pascal’s journey in boxing resembles a diaspora, an ongoing search for belonging—first climbing to the summit in his late twenties, then clinging to its ledges into his forties.

At 42, he is a journeyman by numbers—36 wins, 7 losses, one draw, one no-contest—but in spirit, he remains a gladiator, defying the rust that time insists upon.

Michal Cieślak, at 36, is younger—but only by years. His armour is different: born in Kozienice and polished in the hard streets of Polish boxing, he has driven through 30 pro fights with 27 wins and two losses with one no-contest.

He stands tall at 6’3”, with centimetres to spare and a reach that speaks of dominance—but now occupies the uneasy middle ground of the cruiserweight division. He has tasted title shots—against Ilunga Makabu in 2020 and Lawrence Okolie in 2022—and come up short both times. Brass knuckles of hope and disappointment chafe at his hands in equal measure.

These two men will meet on June 28, in Laval’s Place Bell, nicked by years but not yet broken. Pascal replaces Yamil Peralta in an interim WBC cruiserweight title bout because, legally, he re-entered the rankings at number ten and became eligible.

Such is the mind-numbing politics of boxing. There is poetry—bittersweet and laced with fate—in that arrangement. A boxer who had long retired, suspended for doping in 2021 and dropped from charts, is summoned back to contend for a belt. To some, he is a figure frozen between eras, but his sudden return is an assertion of relevance: a jagged testament that careers refuse to die cleanly.

Pascal’s history is littered with moments that glowed golden. He fought Carl Froch in December 2008 for the vacant WBC super-middleweight title, giving a supremely tactical performance though falling short on points. He defeated Bernard Hopkins in 2009 at the Bell Centre—a victory that seemed to announce a new dynasty—even as the legend Hopkins waged a furious comeback.

Yet his reign at light-heavyweight came with its own yin and yang: brilliance pirouetting beside frailty, shoulder injuries and the agonies of ageing. The victory over Chad Dawson in 2010 brought the WBC and lineal title—but a year later, his loss to Hopkins reminded fans that the torch had shifted.

His later moves were courageous if combustible. Moving up to cruiserweight, he dropped away from the bright lights. By 2018, he had retired—twice—but returned. Wins over Steve Bosse and Ahmed Elbiali came after a TKO of Gary Kopas, suggesting he still had more to say.

Then came a devastating unanimous decision loss to Dmitry Bivol that same year—parting shot of a fading contender. But Pascal steadied himself, rebounding with victories over Marcus Browne and Badou Jack in 2019, regaining interim belts. He was, once again, a man haunted by ghosts of his own ring life—periodically flickering like a halogen lamp in a dank gym.

But every ascent is pulled by gravity, and Pascal’s descent was stark. In March 2023 he lost a wide unanimous decision to Michael Eifert at Place Bell—a crushing blow, not just to his record but to his narrative. He protested, claiming his punches connected.

But in professional boxing, protestations about things seen and unseen are as common as the gloves on the trainers’ table. Once, he was in conversations with Joshua Buatsi for an IBF eliminator; now, he was a cautionary tale. The Canadian media questioned the rationale: “Why bring him back?” they asked. The answer lies in Pascal himself—an economy of survival that defies logic.

Meanwhile, Cieślak has skated precariously close to relevance without ever stepping fully into it. Rising undefeated inside Polish regional circuits, he lifted the IBF Baltic and Polish cruiserweight titles in 2016—though that harvest was marred when both he and his opponent failed doping tests, overturning the win.

Cieślak returned stronger, pushing Ilunga Makabu for the vacant WBC title in Kinshasa in 2020. He lost a decent but hollow unanimous decision: 116–111, 115–111, 114–112. Then he lost again—to Okolie at The O2 in London in 2022, by UD, but he threw knockout charges, flirted with hope—and came back with a surge of regional dominance, claiming and defending the EBU cruiserweight belt.

In his last outing—October 2024—he stopped Felix Valera in Poland. He is grinding, relentless, casting himself in the crimson heat of reinvention. But as he has aged, the world has moved on. Younger dynasties rise—Leavy, Vlasov, Usyk’s shadow—but Cieślak remains parked on the outskirts, a repentant ghost with a lust for validation.

Their collision is a testament to the alchemy of middling glory, a place where careers fracture and sometimes recombine. Neither man is headline-luminous by modern standards. There are no stacks of paydays or flamboyant promoters dangling golden parachutes.

What they hold is history—boxing’s inheritance of sacrifice and pride. They fight in compressed arenas, in mid-tier cards, emblazoned with “interim,” yet rich in psychological weight. Their fights are chronicles of resistance.

Between them lies a theme: the tension between the memory of glory and the risk of becoming nobodies. Pascal, from challenger to champion to comeback artist, wears his scars like commemorative medals—yet the world measures him in decades and deficit.

Cieślak, younger and more untested, has tasted title fights and kickstarted regional ascendancy—but lacks the metaphysical anchor of global renown. His path is orderly; Pascal’s is mythic.

Imagine Pascal pacing late at night in the changing rooms of Place Bell, the same space where he hung his robe back in 2009, before the Hopkins bout. The silence must echo—the ghosts of thousands of fights, the bell’s clangs, the cheers that once blew the roof off.

A man in his fourth decade of fighting doesn’t just carry opponents in his muscles; he carries every coach who whispered, every trainer who screamed, every opponent who broke him a little. His reflection in the mirror is a palimpsest of every round.

The weight of expectation in boxing is not just physical. It is ancestral. Pascal’s journey from Haiti to Canada, his mother’s sacrifice, his ascent as the voice of Quebec boxing, is part of what fuels him still. When he landed on Fanlong Meng in 2022, he said he wanted his “name on record”.

It’s a mantra of longevity, of refusing erasure. And look how quickly sport writes ripples of new memory. Pascal is that ripple, refusing to vanish.

Cieślak’s voice, in contrast, is less weathered in tone but no less desperate. He has said little publicly, but his fists speak. He has polished his future in the fires of disappointment, rebuilding from loss. If Pascal is a once-rising, now-resurgent phoenix, Cieślak is a steady-engineered express train bristling with horsepower but searching for the green light.

They share another similarity: the submarine dread of irrelevance. The fighter’s age is not just chronological—it’s reputational currency. Once a boxer crosses 35, narratives shift: “Still in contention?” becomes more likely than “On the cusp.”

Pascal has worn that whisper for decades; Cieślak is wearing it now. And yet both men challenge that clause. They remind us that relevance is not granted when it is handed; it is taken, with the snap of gloves and the refusal to yield.

In boxing, nobody gives you permission to exist once your biography turns toward the twilight. You take your permission by slipping into the ring, by risking shards of your past, by throwing leather for your future. Pascal and Cieślak are journeymen of the elite—not because they are old, but because they straddle two eras. They live in that twilight zone where the body creaks but the spirit roars.

And so on June 28, the bell will toll not just for a fight but for affirmation. Pascal will step through the ropes carrying the weight of his whole career: champion, comeback, controversy. Cieślak enters girded by youth’s endangerment: undefeated aspirations, near-misses, the burn of title failures. Each punch they trade will echo not just in the arena, but through boxing’s ledger.

The metaphors write themselves. Pascal is the ancient tree, gnarled yet still deep-rooted, its branches heavy with rings of memory and bruised green life. Cieślak is the silver-lined cloud, mobile and forceful, promising rain and storm in the same breath. When cloud meets tree, what becomes of the landscape?

They know: irrelevance is a museum, and they refuse to be exhibits behind glass. They are the men who still see the ring as a place to live—not merely survive. Each training session, each cut rebandaged, each roaring round—all these are defiant pulses against the slow vampirism of time.

Pascal and Cieślak refuse to fade quietly. They occupy the seam between eras—their glory not extinguished, but tarnished, their promise ambivalent. They are mid-level elites with midlines tattooed deep—past greatness and future misgivings bleed together, forging a portrait both mortal and indomitable.

They are reminders that in boxing, history is not erased; it is layered. And every time the bell rings, every time feet shift beneath gloves, these journeymen of the elite are bidding to remain visible. On Saturday, history watches—and wonders if they still belong, not because of who they were, but because of who they become in that moment.