Skip to main content
Boxing News
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Schedule
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Fight Schedule
  • Current Champions

Follow us

  • YouTube YouTube
  • Instagram Instagram
  • Twitter / X Twitter
  • Facebook Facebook

© 2013—2025 Boxing News

Magazine

Canelo Alvarez vindicated?

The implications of the Canelo Alvarez hair test being found negative

John Dennen

27th April, 2018

Canelo Alvarez vindicated?
Golden Boy Promotions

HAS Canelo Alvarez been vindicated? He tested positive for traces of clenbuterol in February. That did oblige him to pull out of his May 5 rematch and saw the Nevada State Athletic Commission handed a Alvarez only a six month suspension, dated from when he failed the test.

The Mexican star maintained the finding was due to eating contaminated meat in Mexico. As he sought to prove himself a clean athlete, through the Nevada Commission, he had hair samples tested. Traces of clenbuterol remain detectable in hair for a longer period. If an athlete had been using clenbuterol for a period of time, i.e. deliberately ingesting the substance as part of a doping programme, this can return a positive test in hair follicles. Canelo’s test came back negative, which would therefore be consistent with a single incident, like eating contaminated meat.

Naturally Eric Gomez, Golden Boy president, Alvarez’s promoter, was satisfied with the finding. He told ESPN, “From the beginning, Canelo has insisted that he accidentally ingested clenbuterol from eating tainted meat… The fact this NSAC-required hair follicle test came back entirely negative for any traces of clenbuterol should lay to rest any suspicion that he was intentionally taking a banned substance.”

Canelo Alvarez

The result certainly doesn’t contradict Canelo’s version of events. But nor does it entirely confirm it. Hair tests for clenbuterol are unreliable, as Iain Kidd writes on Bloody Elbow, and the results can be affected by variables like the colour of the hair, to differing degrees.

Victor Conte, an expert in these matters, does however affirm the result’s significance. “Hair colour does matter. Many factors matter. Yes the hair specimen collection method is very important as is chain of custody. Most fail to understand that many of WADA’s test procedures contain significant variations and limitations,” he said. “It is significant that they did not detect clenbuterol in the hair of Canelo. This is important evidence in favour of Canelo’s defence.”

Alvarez however remains strictly liable for the substances found in his body. (Remember Dillian Whyte getting a two year ban for inadvertently taking a drink that contained a banned substance, with no intention to cheat.) A six month ban is little imposition on Alvarez. He won’t even miss out on a major payday. He’ll be ready to box in September, quite possibly against Gennady Golovkin himself.

More stories

Gervonta Davis, Jake Paul and Anthony Joshua

Anthony Joshua issues emphatic response to calls to replace Gervonta Davis in Jake Paul fight

4 Nov, 2025
Chris Eubank Jr and Conor Benn

Jack Catterall makes KO prediction for Chris Eubank Jr vs Conor Benn rematch: “He stops him”

4 Nov, 2025
Frank Warren, Joshua Buatsi and Zach Parker

Frank Warren reveals his honest score for Joshua Buatsi vs Zach Parker: ‘I thought he won it’

4 Nov, 2025
Lennox Lewis

Lennox Lewis names the American heavyweight who was the hardest puncher he ever faced

4 Nov, 2025
Boxing News

Since 1909

Editorial

  • News
  • Live Coverage
  • BN Investigates
  • Opinion
  • Features

Boxing

  • Upcoming Fight Schedule
  • Current Boxing Champions

Company

  • About Boxing News
  • Contact us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy

Follow us

  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Google News
Copyright 2013—2025 Boxing News