EDDIE HEARN has called for greater transparency in the VADA testing and reporting procedures after Artur Beterbiev returned atypical findings in blood and urine samples taken on December 6.
Beterbiev, the unified light-heavyweight champion, is set to face Callum Smith in Quebec on Saturday and the pair have undergone full VADA testing ahead of the bout.
However, following reports by Kevin Iole on Wednesday evening, it has been confirmed that the Russianโs tests early last month came back โatypicalโ, while Smith, the challenger, was negative for any and all performance enhancing drugs.
As opposed to an โadverse findingโ an atypical one is not considered a contractual violation and is simply a flag for further testing to determine the root cause. Beterbievโs atypical findings in this instance were for human growth hormone and 5D-androstanediol, which both occur naturally in the body.
As such, Beterbiev was tested again on December 15 and December 21 (urine) and December 21 and January 3 (blood) by VADA and the results came back negative.
But Hearn, Smithโs long-term promoter, admitted the receipt of confirmation of VADAโs initial email raised โmonumental concernsโ and has called on the testing agency to provide a more rounded explanation for the finding.
Hearn told Boxing News: โFor once itโs not my fighter and not my show and Iโm just glad the information has got out there. This information was made aware to us in the middle of December.
โItโs difficult because itโs not our show, our testing or our fighter. Letโs make it clear that itโs not an adverse finding but there are raised levels in a test that we want to know more about.
โIn the end, the pressure is on to release that information in fight week. I feel like there needs to be more transparency. Itโs not on us to release that information. Weโre not scientists but we read the information and of course it raises concerns.
โBut at the same time, contractually, itโs not an adverse finding. Iโd much prefer if it was just one or the other – a test is absolutely fine or itโs an adverse finding. When you read the results of a test that has levels above the testing limit, we want to know more.
โThat information has not been as forthcoming as weโd like from VADA. We want to understand more. Transparency is good but Iโm disappointed it has taken so long for it to be released.
โItโs not an adverse finding but we just want to know why? Why were there raised levels in that test? I donโt know enough about it. We would appreciate a little bit more science from the testers to make us feel a little bit more comfortable.
โThereโs no accusation towards Artur Beterbiev. If VADA feel itโs not an adverse finding then on we go. But we want to know more.
โIf youโre saying they can occur naturally and there was a spike in them on those tests, but a week later there was no spike, can that happen? Is that something that happens naturally? Itโs a very grey, cloudy area.
โI just feel there needs to be more transparency of people saying โthis has happened and these are the reasons for itโ. You can imagine when you receive that piece of paper from VADA and youโve got a guy fighting that opponent and you read that, as someone who probably doesnโt understand the science, of course youโre concerns are monumental.
โWe just want to be put at ease and I donโt feel like weโve had that.โ
Meanwhile, Dr Margaret Goodman, who is the founder and chair of VADA, insisted that โno negative inferenceโ can be drawn from the original atypical findings in the December 6 test.
It is understood that โatypicalโ findings are reasonably common and, given that VADA are primarily a testing agency, their role is simply to return test results and not make any determination as to why something is present. Even when VADA return adverse findings, they do not suggest the cause, only report the presence.
Dr Goodman told Boxing News: โAtypical findings are fairly common in PED testing and do not constitute an adverse test result.
โThey can result from various causes. Atypical findings generally warrant the collection of further samples. But no negative inference should be drawn from an atypical finding in and of itself.
โBoth Artur Beterbiev and Callum Smith are enrolled in VADA and are subject to continued testing.โ
In a statement released by Beterbiev, he said:
โIt has come to my attention that Callum intends to disseminate misleading information about my VADA testing program for this fight.
“Let me be clear now: I am a clean athlete. I have never tested positive for a banned substance throughout my amateur and professional career and I complied with all VADA requirements and protocols during the build-up to this fight. Any attempt to imply otherwise, through innuendo or suggestion is slanderous and libelous.
“This conduct is beyond acceptable trash talk in combat sports. Callum is already searching for excuses, looking for a way out. See you Saturday.โ
Beterbiev and Smith will meet at the Centre Videotron, Quebec City on Saturday night in a clash for Beterbievโs IBF, WBC and WBO light-heavyweight titles. He is 19-0 with 19 knockouts.