Skip to main content
Boxing News
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Schedule
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Fight Schedule
  • Current Champions

Follow us

  • YouTube YouTube
  • Instagram Instagram
  • Twitter / X Twitter
  • Facebook Facebook

© 2013—2025 Boxing News

Magazine

Canelo Alvarez vindicated?

The implications of the Canelo Alvarez hair test being found negative

John Dennen

27th April, 2018

Canelo Alvarez vindicated?
Golden Boy Promotions

HAS Canelo Alvarez been vindicated? He tested positive for traces of clenbuterol in February. That did oblige him to pull out of his May 5 rematch and saw the Nevada State Athletic Commission handed a Alvarez only a six month suspension, dated from when he failed the test.

The Mexican star maintained the finding was due to eating contaminated meat in Mexico. As he sought to prove himself a clean athlete, through the Nevada Commission, he had hair samples tested. Traces of clenbuterol remain detectable in hair for a longer period. If an athlete had been using clenbuterol for a period of time, i.e. deliberately ingesting the substance as part of a doping programme, this can return a positive test in hair follicles. Canelo’s test came back negative, which would therefore be consistent with a single incident, like eating contaminated meat.

Naturally Eric Gomez, Golden Boy president, Alvarez’s promoter, was satisfied with the finding. He told ESPN, “From the beginning, Canelo has insisted that he accidentally ingested clenbuterol from eating tainted meat… The fact this NSAC-required hair follicle test came back entirely negative for any traces of clenbuterol should lay to rest any suspicion that he was intentionally taking a banned substance.”

Canelo Alvarez

The result certainly doesn’t contradict Canelo’s version of events. But nor does it entirely confirm it. Hair tests for clenbuterol are unreliable, as Iain Kidd writes on Bloody Elbow, and the results can be affected by variables like the colour of the hair, to differing degrees.

Victor Conte, an expert in these matters, does however affirm the result’s significance. “Hair colour does matter. Many factors matter. Yes the hair specimen collection method is very important as is chain of custody. Most fail to understand that many of WADA’s test procedures contain significant variations and limitations,” he said. “It is significant that they did not detect clenbuterol in the hair of Canelo. This is important evidence in favour of Canelo’s defence.”

Alvarez however remains strictly liable for the substances found in his body. (Remember Dillian Whyte getting a two year ban for inadvertently taking a drink that contained a banned substance, with no intention to cheat.) A six month ban is little imposition on Alvarez. He won’t even miss out on a major payday. He’ll be ready to box in September, quite possibly against Gennady Golovkin himself.

More stories

Zach Parker and Joshua Buatsi

Zach Parker speaks out on the true impact of controversial Joshua Buatsi defeat

4 Nov, 2025
Larry Holmes

Larry Holmes names the true greatest heavyweight of all time

3 Nov, 2025
Joshua Buatsi

Joshua Buatsi reacts to controversial Zach Parker win as fans claim ‘robbery’

3 Nov, 2025

Top Rank have moved on, but 45 years of ESPN classics remain

2 Nov, 2025
Boxing News

Since 1909

Editorial

  • News
  • Live Coverage
  • BN Investigates
  • Opinion
  • Features

Boxing

  • Upcoming Fight Schedule
  • Current Boxing Champions

Company

  • About Boxing News
  • Contact us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy

Follow us

  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Google News
Copyright 2013—2025 Boxing News