Do you expect Dillian Whyte vs Alexander Povetkin to be a bout worthy of the pay-per-view platform?

Chris McKenna
Sports journalist
Iโ€™m sure if it turns out to be a slugfest with knockdowns galore then everyone involved will say โ€˜you get what you pay forโ€™ but letโ€™s be realistic โ€“ itโ€™s an interim title fight between a heavyweight contender and a faded force. PPV should be reserved for elite fights and if Whyte wasnโ€™t behind a paywall his standing would soar.

Dave Allen
Heavyweight contender

Iโ€™m not sure about a fight thatโ€™s truly worthy of pay-per-view because you never know how a fight is going to play out. But itโ€™s a fight between two Top 10 heavyweights and is an interesting matchup. Both have the capabilities to end the fight early but I think Whyte wins on points.

Carl Greaves
Promoter and trainer
I just donโ€™t think we should be staging pay-per-view fights in the current climate. I understand that money needs to be made and I understand that shows are not making any money, but it seems wrong somehow with so much uncertainty out there to put a price tag on a fight.

Scott Quigg
Former WBA champion
Pay-per-view is down to your own interpretation. Ordinarily it might not be worthy of PPV but weโ€™re living in strange times. In this climate, itโ€™s exciting and will be good to to have that โ€˜big fight feelingโ€™ again. Eddie Hearn deserves credit for managing to stage a fight of this magnitude at this time.

Read this week’s Editor’s Letter here

Share Page